<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Aspect Orbs: An Emergency Posting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theinnerwheel.com/2011/07/15/aspect-orbs-an-emergency-posting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theinnerwheel.com/2011/07/15/aspect-orbs-an-emergency-posting/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=aspect-orbs-an-emergency-posting</link>
	<description>Astrology with Dawn Bodrogi</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 16:56:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dawn Bodrogi</title>
		<link>http://theinnerwheel.com/2011/07/15/aspect-orbs-an-emergency-posting/#comment-5559</link>
		<dc:creator>Dawn Bodrogi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 17:22:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theinnerwheel.com/?p=2266#comment-5559</guid>
		<description>Unaspected planets need a post of their own.  I&#039;ll put one up, with illustrations, soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unaspected planets need a post of their own.  I&#8217;ll put one up, with illustrations, soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andie</title>
		<link>http://theinnerwheel.com/2011/07/15/aspect-orbs-an-emergency-posting/#comment-5555</link>
		<dc:creator>Andie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 03:46:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theinnerwheel.com/?p=2266#comment-5555</guid>
		<description>What about unaspected planets?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about unaspected planets?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dawn Bodrogi</title>
		<link>http://theinnerwheel.com/2011/07/15/aspect-orbs-an-emergency-posting/#comment-3251</link>
		<dc:creator>Dawn Bodrogi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2012 19:35:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theinnerwheel.com/?p=2266#comment-3251</guid>
		<description>The short answer is yes, but it depends on the importance of the relative planets in the chart.  If the two planets that are making the aspect are heavyweights, while the one that doesn&#039;t is not, it won&#039;t have as much influence.  If the planet not aspected is an important one, it will matter more.  But on the whole yes, because when a planet hits an angle it magnifies its influence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The short answer is yes, but it depends on the importance of the relative planets in the chart.  If the two planets that are making the aspect are heavyweights, while the one that doesn&#8217;t is not, it won&#8217;t have as much influence.  If the planet not aspected is an important one, it will matter more.  But on the whole yes, because when a planet hits an angle it magnifies its influence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ula</title>
		<link>http://theinnerwheel.com/2011/07/15/aspect-orbs-an-emergency-posting/#comment-3240</link>
		<dc:creator>Ula</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2012 22:21:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theinnerwheel.com/?p=2266#comment-3240</guid>
		<description>Hi,
I was wondering if you could give me some feedback on this scenario: If a person has two planets conjuncting an angle, and a third planet aspects the angle and one if the planets, but not the second one from the initial conjunction, would that second planet still be pulled into the aspect because it&#039;s angular and conjuncting the first planet?  Hope I made sense and thanks for your help.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
I was wondering if you could give me some feedback on this scenario: If a person has two planets conjuncting an angle, and a third planet aspects the angle and one if the planets, but not the second one from the initial conjunction, would that second planet still be pulled into the aspect because it&#8217;s angular and conjuncting the first planet?  Hope I made sense and thanks for your help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nobody</title>
		<link>http://theinnerwheel.com/2011/07/15/aspect-orbs-an-emergency-posting/#comment-2477</link>
		<dc:creator>Nobody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2012 10:37:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theinnerwheel.com/?p=2266#comment-2477</guid>
		<description>Thank God.

 I am tired of how some seniors in various forums arrogantly discard aspects. &#039;you dont have this&#039; ,&#039;you dont have that&#039; and what not because it is not within the stingy 1-1.5 deg orb that they use..

I think humans go insecure unless they can attach a predictable pattern into something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank God.</p>
<p> I am tired of how some seniors in various forums arrogantly discard aspects. &#8216;you dont have this&#8217; ,&#8217;you dont have that&#8217; and what not because it is not within the stingy 1-1.5 deg orb that they use..</p>
<p>I think humans go insecure unless they can attach a predictable pattern into something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeff c.</title>
		<link>http://theinnerwheel.com/2011/07/15/aspect-orbs-an-emergency-posting/#comment-1761</link>
		<dc:creator>jeff c.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 13:40:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theinnerwheel.com/?p=2266#comment-1761</guid>
		<description>Thanks dawn, this is something that&#039;s bugged amateur me for ages! The list at the end of the article is pure gold! Your writing is, by far, the best, most interesting astrology I&#039;ve come across on the web!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks dawn, this is something that&#8217;s bugged amateur me for ages! The list at the end of the article is pure gold! Your writing is, by far, the best, most interesting astrology I&#8217;ve come across on the web!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LB</title>
		<link>http://theinnerwheel.com/2011/07/15/aspect-orbs-an-emergency-posting/#comment-1165</link>
		<dc:creator>LB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 20:55:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theinnerwheel.com/?p=2266#comment-1165</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Dawn.  This is such good advice.  I’ve always found it frustrating when a personal experience or direct observation regarding an aspect is invalidated because the aspect was out of orb . . . by half a degree or one degree, or two, or three, etc.  

While I understand the intention behind adhering to such strict rules, it doesn’t allow much room for our inner guidance to come into play.  Plus, there’s the person’s reality to consider – if it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck, maybe it’s a duck!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Dawn.  This is such good advice.  I’ve always found it frustrating when a personal experience or direct observation regarding an aspect is invalidated because the aspect was out of orb . . . by half a degree or one degree, or two, or three, etc.  </p>
<p>While I understand the intention behind adhering to such strict rules, it doesn’t allow much room for our inner guidance to come into play.  Plus, there’s the person’s reality to consider – if it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck, maybe it’s a duck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: helen</title>
		<link>http://theinnerwheel.com/2011/07/15/aspect-orbs-an-emergency-posting/#comment-1164</link>
		<dc:creator>helen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 18:53:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theinnerwheel.com/?p=2266#comment-1164</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve always suspected this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve always suspected this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
